Interview
 
Vikram Gokhale
Jaywant Dalvi's controversial play BARRISTER, which catapulted Vikram Gokhale into the limelight 33 years ago, is back on stage and this time Gokhale himself is directing it. In an exclusive interview Gokhale discloses that he plans to treat the audience to a special show of BARRISTER in which he will essay the title role yet again - but only after it completes 25 shows.

 Deepa Ranade

VIKRAM GOKHALEThere is a rustle of excitement about the revival of BARRISTER since it was a classic of its time. What is your emotional connect with the play that prompted you to take up its direction?

Oh, I have a great emotional connect with the play. I was really excited when I was offered the direction of BARRISTER because whatever I am today is because of this play and the title role and from whatever I learnt from my guru Vijaya Mehta, who directed the play back then. I can never forget that 33 years ago when I started doing this play - I was transformed into an intelligent actor. And even after Vijaya ji stopped directing the play, I kept the show going - at times by hiring even the Air India crew. We staged it in London. Later I directed and edited the DVD version of the play. So when producer Neelam Shirke approached me for its direction - I said YES!- without batting an eyelid.

How many shows of BARRISTER did you perform as an actor?

I did 250 shows spread over three years.

Please illustrate how your Guru's direction enriched you in terms of acting and understanding the finer nuances of theatre.

I must tell you this - Vijaya Mehta had originally rejected me saying that I would not understand the play. She recalled me after a month saying that she was casting me out of sheer desperation - she wasn't able to find another actor! She challenged me then, "Let us see what you make out of it." That's when I learnt to read the subtext of a play and that is how I was trained. Vijaya Mehta taught me so many things. For instance, trying not to cry is the best way to cry and grab the audience's attention. It is not necessary to cry buckets to express sorrow; it can be achieved through subtler means like dialogue or ironic expressions.

BARRISTER is a play about an upright legal professional who championed gender equality way back in the 1910s. He rued the tonsuring of young widows and of the rigid social strictures that deprived them of a normal life. He opposed Hindu rituals that oppressed women. How his life ends in a tragedy is what the play is about. The play itself and its various characters have taught me so many lessons about life as well.

Apart from nostalgia, what is the purpose behind the revival of BARRISTER?

The play has complex characters. It should be seen by the younger lot of actors, writers, directors as well as theatergoers. BARRISTER is a compact course in theatrics. Unfortunately today's generation is unaware of the rich theatre that existed 30 years ago. The play used to be part of the Marathi MA syllabus - it has such a great literary value. Dr. Uma Dadegaonkar has even done her doctorate on the play. Her thesis makes an in-depth and an interesting read.

Have you incorporated changes in order to make the play easy to understand?

Not many changes but some characters which I felt were neglected in the initial run have been fortified now. Vijaya Mehta attended the opening show of my BARRISTER and she patted my back. She said after 33 years, I had made me re-live that creative high!

Isn't the play rather dated for today's viewers?

The story may be based in the 1910s. However the emotions and human feelings remain unchanged till the end of time. What happens to a man who thinks rationally and ahead of his times and what happens to a woman who is socially ostracized and tonsured at the age of 12? These emotions are powerful enough to hit the audience even today. So I took it up as a challenge and encouraged a new generation of actors to present it.

How difficult was it to cast actors in a play that is so demanding and exacting? On top of it there is your tremendous performance as a benchmark!

All actors were cast as per the requirements of the characters. I explained the actors the story, their characters and the inter actions and connections. Within 60 hours I completed the direction. My team is on a roll now. I have asked them to discover on their own something deeper, wider and taller in the play. Shailesh Datar approached me for the role of the villain Tatya Velankar. Since all other actors whom I wanted to cast in the title role were busy in films and television - I had to settle for Shailesh as the Barrister. The villain's role is now being played by theatre veteran Jayant Savarkar. Shaku Naresh, Advait Dadarkar and Shashi a student of mine from Australia are also in it.

Which actor was your original choice for the role of the Barrister?

Subodh Bhave, Prasad Oak, Aniket Vishwas Rao or Jeetendra Joshi - they are all studious actors. Though a little elderly for the role, I had also tapped Sharad Ponkshe but he backed out on account of not having enough time on his hands to do justice to the role.

How did you overcome the temptation of casting yourself?

I am now 65 and the role demands that the Barrister be 40-45. For documentation purpose, however, after the completion of 25 shows - I will do one show as the Barrister and the next as the villain Tatya Velankar. This is purely for academic purpose. But I don't want to brag and play the Barrister at this age. I am rather pleased with my new team.

BARRISTER has just had two shows so far and it is early days yet to say - but is the audience receiving the play with the same enthusiasm as it did 33 years ago?

I am slightly disappointed with today's audience; I feel they are wanting in comprehending the play. They are laughing at the wrong junctures like Nanasaheb's chant of 'Datta, Datta.' That which is supposed to be tragic is bringing out laughs!!

You are directing a play, a film (Aaghat) and also acting in the play KATHA and in other films. From where do you get all that energy at your ripe age?

I create more time in 24 hours - like there is no need to answer every call that you get or surf the Internet now and then. You can do with lesser hours of sleep and generally get yourself better organized. It can be managed. I am delighted with my film Aaghat set against a backdrop from the medical field. It talks about the prevalent corruption and decadence in the field. It has been nominated for the Pune International Film Festival.

*Deepa Ranade is a film and theatre reviewer. She has been an entertainment journalist for over fifteen years.








read / post your comments




   Discussion Board


Schedule


Theatre Workshops
Register a workshop | View all workshops

Subscribe


About Us | Feedback | Contact Us | Write to us | Careers | Free Updates via SMS
List Your Play